Risk Categories We Evaluate
Our analysis framework assesses every opportunity across standardized risk dimensions.
Financial Risk
Revenue sustainability, cash flow, capital structure
Operational Risk
Supply chain, execution capability, key dependencies
Legal & Compliance Risk
Regulatory compliance, permits, contractual obligations
Market Risk
Customer concentration, competitive dynamics, market conditions
Country & Political Risk
Jurisdiction stability, currency, regulatory environment
Team Risk
Key person dependencies, succession planning, expertise
Technical Risk
Technology maturity, scalability, security
Our Approach
Our evidence-based analysis combines AI-assisted processing with expert human review to identify potential risks and gaps in project documentation. For each risk category, we evaluate:
- Presence of Evidence: Is there documentation supporting or contradicting the claim?
- Evidence Quality: Is the documentation current, verifiable, and relevant?
- Consistency: Do different evidence items tell a coherent story?
- Gaps: What information is missing that investors would typically expect?
Severity Ratings
When we identify a risk, we assign a severity rating based on potential impact if the risk materializes:
Severity is distinct from materiality. A high-severity risk might be low materiality if it's very unlikely or well-mitigated. Learn more about this distinction in our Risk vs. Materiality explainer.
How We Use These Categories
- Every project is evaluated against the same categories for consistency
- Categories help organize evidence and ensure comprehensive coverage
- Gaps in any category are explicitly flagged for investor attention
- Changes in risk profile are tracked across evaluation versions
Our goal is not to make investment decisions for you, but to ensure you have a structured, comprehensive view of the risks involved.
Disclaimer: This content is generated to assist review. It is not investment advice and should be independently validated.